If other brands containing PFOS come to our attention, we will update this section. Studies have found potential links between high levels of PFOA in the body and a range of illnesses including. 7 million settlement with DuPont and Chemours Co. faced off Tuesday before a congressional panel examining a product at the center of a national pollution scandal. has settled a lawsuit with Minnesota’s Attorney General Lori Swanson for $850 million. A $5 billion water-pollution lawsuit, which pitted 3M Co. The three most prevalent PFAAs, detected in all samples, were PFOS, PFHxS and PFOA (). Both PFOA and PFOS were commonly used in manufacturing, but 3M stopped making the chemicals over a decade ago. Wilmington, Delaware-based chemical company DuPont announced Monday that it has agreed to a $670. Two more lawsuits have been filed on behalf of 14 residents of Bucks and Montgomery counties who were exposed to perfluorinated compounds in their drinking water, bringing the total filed to four. Hampton Bays Water District Files Lawsuit Over Well Contamination the five manufacturers—the 3M Company in Delaware, Buckeye Fire Protection Company in North Carolina, Chemguard Inc. who has PFAS chemicals in their blood A CLASS ACTION lawsuit against 3M , DuPont, and Chemours was filed this week on behalf of everyone in the United States who has been exposed to PFAS chemicals. DuPont C8 Lawsuit Information. 3M synthesized PFOA by electrochemical fluorination in Minnesota from 1947 to. Firefighting Foam & Cancer. 3M in Johnson & Johnson lawsuit settlement. YET ANOTHER PFOA (FIREFIGHTING FOAM CHEMICALS) CONTAMINATION LAWSUIT: Green et al v. Paul, MN 55133. The complaint alleges 3M scientists in the 1970s concluded the chemicals “were even more. New Hampshire does not seek a specific dollar amount in the lawsuits. Through 2001, the DoD purchased AFFF from 3M and/or Ansul Inc. At the time of this announcement, the EPA wrote in a news release: "3M data supplied to EPA. The primary manufacturer of PFOS, 3M, began a voluntary phase-out of production in 2000 following a series of studies showing significant accumulation in the environment. , National Foam, Chemguard, and others. 3M says: Although certain PFAS have been detected in the environment at low levels, their mere presence does not mean they're harmful. A lawsuit filed by Minnesota against 3M, the company that first developed and sold PFOS and PFOA, the two best-known PFAS compounds, has revealed that the company knew that these chemicals were. Some of the most common lawsuits related to PFOA and PFOS nationwide. CONCORD (AP) — New Hampshire has sued eight companies, including 3M and the DuPont Co. Law Firm Seeks Class-Action Status in 3M PFOA Case. Case closure comes as global regulators consider PFOA restrictions. Saturday, October 6, 2018 - Nationwide Class-Action Lawsuit Targets DuPont, Chemours, 3M, and other Makers of PFAS Chemicals A CLASS ACTION lawsuit against 3M, DuPont, and Chemours was filed this week on behalf of everyone in the United States who has been exposed to PFAS chemicals. DuPont lawsuits (re PFOA pollution in USA) DuPont is a manufacturer of the plastic material, Teflon, in Parkersburg, West Virginia, USA. Each PFAS compound needs to be evaluated based upon its own properties. The trial is scheduled for March 2019. for damage it says has been caused by a class of potentially toxic chemicals found in pizza boxes, fast-food wrappers and. PFOA - perfluorooctanoic acid - is a suspected carcinogen used in making Teflon. and National Foam, Inc, companies that produced and sold aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), a firefighting product containing the chemicals PFOA and PFOS. In Minnesota v. The story began in 1951, when DuPont started purchasing PFOA (which the company refers to as C8) from 3M for use in the manufacturing of Teflon. Saturday, October 6, 2018 - Nationwide Class-Action Lawsuit Targets DuPont, Chemours, 3M, and other Makers of PFAS Chemicals A CLASS ACTION lawsuit against 3M, DuPont, and Chemours was filed this week on behalf of everyone in the United States who has been exposed to PFAS chemicals. Making Polluters Pay. Why Investors Should Be Wary of DuPont's and Chemours' PFOA Woes Literally thousands of PFOA-related lawsuits have been filed against DuPont. 3M and Dyneon no longer use PFOA or PFOS in the manufacturing process. like the lawsuit. 3M has agreed to pay $850 million to the State of Minnesota to resolve a $5 billion lawsuit over drinking water contaminated with fluorochemicals such as perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). million to settle a lawsuit stemming from PFOS and PFOA pollution downstream of their factory in Ala-bama, USA. The cost will be split. The small set of documents from the Minnesota litigation portrays an incomplete and misleading story that distorts the full record regarding 3M’s actions with respect to PFOA and PFOS, as well as who we are as a company. has settled a lawsuit with Minnesota's Attorney General Lori Swanson for $850 million, putting an end to eight years of litigation over a former Scotchgard ingredient that got into the. Thank you for the add. The Teflon cookware’s PFOA is harmful not only to humans, but to animals and the environment as well. In May 2009, PFOS was determined to be a persistent organic pollutant (POP) by the Stockholm Convention. In June 2018 the State of New York sued 3M Co. The chemical is now the subject of about 3,500 personal injury claims against DuPont, along with others filed against various companies that used the chemical. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today. Paul, near 3M facilities. Class-action lawsuits have been filed as far back as 2001 against companies such as 3M and DuPont over PFOA contamination of water near factories or disposal sites in a host of communities, including Decatur, Alabama, and Cottage Grove, Minnesota. In 1951, DuPont started purchasing PFOA from then-Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company for use in the manufacturing of teflon, a product that brought DuPont a billion-dollar-a-year profit by the 1990s. "3M has worked closely with regulators and community stakeholders to address the environmental presence of PFOA and PFOS. Making Polluters Pay. Baron & Budd is investigating lawsuits after a recent finding that the water supply in the City of Airway Heights, Washington, may be contaminated with perfluorinated chemicals known as PFOS and PFOA. 3M—a $115 billion dollar company—will pay $35 million to settle a water contamination lawsuit (detailed on docplayer), which alleges the company contaminated the water supply of West Morgan-East Lawrence Water Authority with industrial chemicals discharged into the Tennessee River. Notably, lawsuits arising from the widespread use of AFFFs-containing PFOA and PFOS-have grown so numerous that in November 2018, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation granted an order to transfer and consolidate 75 cases from around the country. MFG0015 3M - Rochester 1999 Mt Read Blvd Rochester, NY Monroe YES NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO MFG0016 3M - Tonawanda 305 Sawyer Ave PFOA/PFOS Facility Identification. The pending lawsuits against 3M and others allege that AFFFs containing PFOS and PFAS contaminated groundwater at various military bases, airports and other sites where the foams were used, eventually causing a purported need for medical monitoring or resulting in various personal injuries, property damage and/or other economic losses. October: Attorney Robert Bilott, who filed the original lawsuit against DuPont in the early 2000s, filed a class action lawsuit against 3M, Chemours, DuPont, and other makers of PFAS on behalf of Ohio firefighter Kevin Hardwick and every person in the U. The Decatur Daily story said the Minnesota lawsuit was centered on 3M’s disposal of perfluorochemicals and their compounds (PFOA and PFOS). In 2006, eight major manufacturing companies, including 3M Company and DuPont Co. October 2017 PFOA and PFOS are extremely persistent in the environment and resistant to typical environmental degradation processes. In 2009 the Emerald Coast Utility Authority (ECUA) filed suit in federal court against the 3M Company, Solutia, DuPont, et al for contamination of its drinking water wells with PFOA and PFOS. is no stranger to lawsuits and settlements. DuPont has faced thousands of lawsuits regarding its Teflon products and PFOA exposure since the late 1990s. The cost will be split. “3M also under-reported to the Alabama Department of Environmental Management its discharge of chemicals into the Tennessee River. Although 3M has admitted no wrongdoing, the settlement is the result of lengthy. who has PFAS in their blood. The jury trial, which had been. Lerner documents the extensive deceptions carried out DuPont and 3M around PFOA that persisted until 2005, when DuPont settled a $343 million class action lawsuit,. If letters the NYSDEC. 3M produced PFOA and PFOS at its plant in Decatur, about 10 miles upstream from WMEL’s water treatment plant. (CN) – A north Alabama water supplier sued 3M, DuPont and a number of other corporate defendants on Monday for allegedly contributing to chemical contamination in the Coosa River. Those who were in any branch in the U. Defendant, Angus Fire ("Angus") has. See the 3M Settlement page for more information. The Decatur Daily story said the Minnesota lawsuit was centered on 3M’s disposal of perfluorochemicals and their compounds (PFOA and PFOS). The agreement. and National Fire Foam Inc. Today, Attorney General Grewal, DEP Commissioner McCabe, and Acting Division of Consumer Affairs Director Paul Rodríguez announced a suit against 3M, DuPont, and others for manufacturing or selling toxic chemicals in firefighting foam product. Opinion for Emerald Coast Utilities Authority v. 3M agreed April 25 to pay a $1. million to settle a lawsuit stemming from PFOS and PFOA pollution downstream of their factory in Ala-bama, USA. DuPont paid $300 million to settle a class-action lawsuit after residents of Ohio and West Virginia found. According to 3M's tests, PFOA was present in five parts per billion in the bloodstream, says Mr Webb. I believe PFOS is the more harmful chemical 3M got in trouble with, which is shown to be toxic. 3M has produced perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) since the 1960s and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) since 1999 as byproducts of the non-stick goods it manufactured. Attorney general says, "You can absolutely expect to see something in regard to litigation against 3M and some of the. Another example of private party action to establish PFOA and PFOS liability involves a lawsuit against the company 3M. This leachate is sent to Dry Creek Waste Water Treatment Plant, owned and operated by.  She visited Comstock Park High School for a town hall led by three law firms that recently filed a class action lawsuit against Wolverine Worldwide, 3M and Waste Management. 5 6 PFOS was a key ingredient in 3M’s stain-resistant Scotchgard, which had thousands of consumer and industrial. The lawsuit was brought against Daikin and 3M over PFC chemicals the companies used to produce at their Decatur facilities. 3M has settled a lawsuit alleging that it contaminated drinking water with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in Decatur, Alabama, where it made fluorochemicals until 2002. New Hampshire is the latest state to file suit against a number of companies, including Dupont and 3M, for their roles in a nationwide drinking water contamination crisis. However, these –popular. Referencing a lawsuit involving PFOA and PFOS filed by the state of Minnesota against 3M — a lawsuit that settled last year for $850 million — the general manager of WMEL began the push for. As a resident of Hoosick Falls that uses water from the town or private wells, you are being exposed to contaminated water. We especially would appreciate the dates for the first-time use of PFOA and PFOS or 3M. , National Foam, Chemguard, and others. In fact, it was not until early 2000, when neighboring property owners filed a private lawsuit against DuPont in Parkersburg, West Virginia, and a cache of documents was finally produced in. Moreover, new charges against chemical manufacturers (including 3M we think that these allegations specific to PFOA will be dismissed. 3M -- which invented the fluorochemicals polluting 28 known sites in Michigan -- is facing a similar but separate lawsuit in its which contained PFOA/PFOS, 3M has repeatedly assured Wolverine. for damage it says has been caused by a class of potentially toxic chemicals found in pizza boxes. 3M settled similar allegations the next year for $1. Through 2001, the DoD purchased AFFF from 3M and/or Ansul Inc. 7 million settlement of a long-running PFOA lawsuit in the Mid-Ohio Valley. Ridgewood Water names 3M as the "primary manufacturer of PFOA and PFOS" for the past several decades in its complaint, pointing to products such as Scotchguard stain repellent, food packaging, coating substances and additives produced before 2002. Read the full article by Sharon Lerner "A CLASS ACTION lawsuit against 3M, DuPont, and Chemours was filed this week on behalf of everyone in the United States who has been exposed to PFAS chemicals. The non-profit environmental organization Tennessee Riverkeeper also filed suit against 3M and other companies regarding PFOA and PFOS contamination of the river, noting that landfill runoff containing high levels of these chemicals is entering the river and the groundwater. 3M Settlement over NJ Contaminated Drinking Water commonly known as PFOA — from DuPont' Chamber Works facility, which is located four miles from the center of town. WWW used Scotchgard, a 3M product containing perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in its manufacturing process. Its half-life has been estimated at 5. NATIONWIDE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT TARGETS DUPONT, CHEMOURS, 3M, AND OTHER MAKERS OF PFAS CHEMICALS Sharon Lerner | October 6 2018, 6:30 a. It has been in commercial use since the 1940s. Class-action lawsuits have been filed as far back as 2001 against companies such as 3M and DuPont over PFOA contamination of water near factories or disposal sites in a host of communities,. Last year, 3M paid $850 million to settle a lawsuit brought by the state of Minnesota that showed the company knew for decades about the health hazards of PFAS but hid that information from the. who has PFAS chemicals in their blood. House considers dozens of bills to limit widely used PFAS. 3M says: Although certain PFAS have been detected in the environment at low levels, their mere presence does not mean they're harmful. Osborne to Michael Tibbetts (MPCA) re: MPCA Letter dated March 15, 1983, concerning the March 3, 1983, MPCA inspection of Chemolite incinerator of the 3M Chemolite Incinerator (SW-9) and the Boiler Ash Disposal Site (SW-224). It accused DuPont and 3M of knowing the dangers of PFAS going back as far as the 1950s but not making it public while continuing to market the compounds. and National Fire Foam Inc. In 2010, the attorney general of Minnesota filed a lawsuit against 3M for PFOA and PFOS contamination. The C8 Science Panel is one of the largest epidemiological studies of PFOA. 3M has agreed to pay $850 million to the state of Minnesota to resolve a $5 billion lawsuit over drinking water contaminated with fluorochemicals such as perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). And the company continues to fight litigation related to the sale of products made using perfluorooctanyl compounds (PFOA and PFOS) and lawsuits for damages suffered by users of its respirator masks. Posted By August 5, 2016; Litigation, News; By Evan Belanger Staff Writer Decatur Daily. Saturday, October 6, 2018 - Nationwide Class-Action Lawsuit Targets DuPont, Chemours, 3M, and other Makers of PFAS Chemicals A CLASS ACTION lawsuit against 3M, DuPont, and Chemours was filed this week on behalf of everyone in the United States who has been exposed to PFAS chemicals. DuPont, Chemours settle PFOA lawsuit for $670m. However, the most comprehensive study of PFOA health effects resulted from the 2006 settlement of a lawsuit brought against DuPont for contaminating the drinking water supply of approximately 70,000 people living in communities along the Ohio River in West Virginia and Ohio. She made these claims even though documents revealed in a lawsuit filed by the state of Minnesota showed 3M’s own scientists knew of the compound’s environmental and health threats. "With respect to the lawsuit's claims about PFCs, 3M does not believe the chemistries in question present harm to. Don’t drink the Teflon. In February 2017, DuPont and its spinoff company agreed to pay nearly $671 million to thousands of Mid-Ohio Valley residents affected by C8, a man-made chemical used to make Teflon that has been linked to cancer and other serious side effects. PFAS-related suits gain steam as litigants hit Wolverine Worldwide. Despite that settlement, and the internal 3M documents, Rutherford, a company vice president, maintained that there is no concrete scientific evidence showing that PFOA and PFOS cause adverse human health effects. Its half-life has been estimated at 5. But the experts also said that the facts in those cases, including the actions taken by companies and alleged health problems, would ultimately determine their outcome. Unfortunately, 3M’s miracle product also contained PFOS. I was diagnosed with prostate cancer and had my prostate removed in April of this year. n Oklahoma petroleum refinery has sued several chemical manufacturers and fire suppression equipment companies for damages it expects to incur because of a type of chemical that was used in the fire-extinguishing foam stored and used at the refinery. Buckeye Fire Equipment Company; Chemguard, Inc. And the day of reckoning may be coming sooner rather. Ohio files lawsuit against DuPont for allegedly dumping toxic chemical into Ohio River. In 2003, PFOS, PFOA, AND OTHER FLUOROCHEMICALS. In fact, DuPont had to pay millions of dollars to settle thousands of lawsuits after PFOA leaked from their West Virginia plant and contaminated local water supplies. Separately, an environmental group is suing 3M for allegedly releasing two PFCs – perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctane sulfonate – into the Tennessee River and contaminating drinking water. such as the common types PFOA and PFOS that have been detected in the east metro, cause no harm to people at levels typically found in the. 3M has settled a lawsuit alleging that it contaminated drinking water with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in Decatur, Alabama, where it made fluorochemicals until 2002. The lawsuit also names Chemours Company, Chemguard Inc. As a result, the Authority “has distributed and continues to distribute water containing. , Chemguard and National Foam, Inc. The tests were commissioned by 3M, the giant chemical company that first manufactured the two most notorious members of the PFAS family, PFOS and PFOA. For decades, DuPont, 3M, Saint-Gobain, and other companies manufactured and/or used PFOA, PFOS and other perfluorochemicals during the manufacture of products that resist heat, oil, stains, grease, and water. Daryl Roberts Chief Operations & Engineering Officer DuPont de Nemours, Inc. Named in the suit as defendants are 3M Company, the Ansul Company, Angus Fire, Buckeye Fire Protection Co. The plaintiffs in the first lawsuit are asking for money, but Tennessee Riverkeepers are merely asking for 3M to be held responsible for the contamination they allegedly caused. - New Hampshire has sued eight companies including 3M and the DuPont Co. By Brian Amaral. In the 1950s, 3M expanded worldwide with operations in Canada, Mexico, France, Germany, Australia, and the United Kingdom. The lawsuit — which also names 3M subsidiary Dyneon and DuPont spinoff Chemours as defendants — claims the companies are responsible for producing and selling PFOA-based products to Long. As part of the Minnesota lawsuit against 3M, a Science Publication Strategy from 1998 was released, which details how the company planned to release selected studies on PFASs and use their narrative to make it clear the substances were not harmful. Today, Attorney General Grewal, DEP Commissioner McCabe, and Acting Division of Consumer Affairs Director Paul Rodríguez announced a suit against 3M, DuPont, and others for manufacturing or selling toxic chemicals in firefighting foam product. Posted on August 26, 2019 | Firm News In a precedent setting Order issued August 23, 2019, a federal judge has ruled that a lawsuit brought by a group of residents of Bennington and North Bennington, Vermont damaged by PFOA groundwater contamination can proceed against defendant Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics as a class action. During this hearing 3m, DuPont, and Chemours will denouce their responsibility for firefighters and veterans with cancer as a result of their PFAS. Baron & Budd was the first firm in the nation to file suit on behalf of an airport against AFFF foam manufactures for PFOA/PFOS groundwater contamination. Specifically, the company, which has manufactured products containing the contaminant per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and perfluorochemicals (PFCs) is producing studies that refute the levels at which the presence of the chemicals becomes a health hazard. Case closure comes as global regulators consider PFOA restrictions. DuPont's deadly deceit: The decades-long cover-up behind the "world's most slippery material" For decades DuPont operated above the EPA and knowingly concealed the dangers of Teflon exposure. Comments regarding the PFAS (Per-and poly-fluoroalkyl substances) National Environmental Management Plan Friends of the Earth Australia Anthony Amis ajamis50@gmail. 3M also sponsored lab tests by Exygen that detected no PFOA contamination at 25-parts-per-trillion limit. Lawsuit Filed For PFOA and PFOS Contamination in the Hampton Bays Water District, Town of Southampton, New York. New MCLs for perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) and PFOS were also proposed by the NJDEP in 2017 In 2010, the State of Minnesota filed a lawsuit against the 3M Company, which argued that 3M had “willfully disregarded the potential harm of [perfluorinated chemicals]…before it discontinued production of PFOA and PFOS. Attorney Frank Petosa filed the lawsuit in the Southern District Court of Florida. PFOA - perfluorooctanoic acid - is a suspected carcinogen used in making Teflon. there were ~3,500 lawsuits filed in. Read the full article by Sharon Lerner "A CLASS ACTION lawsuit against 3M, DuPont, and Chemours was filed this week on behalf of everyone in the United States who has been exposed to PFAS chemicals. "3M acted responsibly in connection with products containing PFAS, and will vigorously. The lawsuit says the defendants should be required to cover the state's costs for investigating and in the future remediating PFOA/PFOS contamination at the identified sites and at others that may. Last fall, residents and a local water authority initiated a class action lawsuit against 3M and its subsidiaries, claiming the residents have ingested dangerous levels of PFOA and PFOS and seeking monetary damages as a result. “3M acted responsibly in connection with its manufacture and sale of AFFF (aqueous film-forming foam) and will defend its record of environmental stewardship,” the statement says. Furthermore, it disclosed that there is a likely possibility of further lawsuits being filed on the company for the harmful effect of a compound named PFOA. The chemicals are man-made and used to make items fire resistant and oil, stain, grease, and water repellant. I believe PFOS is the more harmful chemical 3M got in trouble with, which is shown to be toxic. Scotchgard is made from a chemical that breaks down into PFOS. On-site disposal practices have resulted in groundwater contamination and the contamination of the Wheeler Reservoir of the Tennessee River. PFOA and PFOS, collectively referred to as PFAS, are chemicals that have been in use for decades typically used to make carpets, clothing and fabrics for furniture. Thousands of suits against manufacturers of products involving PFOA have been filed, including against 3M, which was the primary producer of PFOA, and DuPont. In their quarterly filing to the U. 5 million over allegations the company violated the Toxic Substances Control Act by not reporting PFOA safety risks to the EPA. The potential dangers of PFOS and PFOA have been suspected for years. who has PFAS chemicals in their blood. Those who were in any branch in the U. In one lawsuit — filed against 3M Co. Posted on August 26, 2019 | Firm News In a precedent setting Order issued August 23, 2019, a federal judge has ruled that a lawsuit brought by a group of residents of Bennington and North Bennington, Vermont damaged by PFOA groundwater contamination can proceed against defendant Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics as a class action. conglomerate 3M in a lawsuit that focused on PFOA and. Much of that evidence became public only because of a lawsuit. That lawsuit named 3M, Tyco Fire Products, National Foam, Buckeye Fire Equipment, Kidde-Fenwal, and Chemguard. New Hampshire has sued eight companies including 3M and the DuPont Co. In 1984, DuPont became aware that PFOA was present in the local water supply. Critically, the settlement also allows 3M to largely escape a public airing of how it shielded itself from responsibility for PFOA contamination even though DuPont, which bought PFOA from 3M for years, was  held liable  for causing kidney cancer and other diseases. October 2017 PFOA and PFOS are extremely persistent in the environment and resistant to typical environmental degradation processes. BENNINGTON, Vt. Lerner documents the extensive deceptions carried out DuPont and 3M around PFOA that persisted until 2005, when DuPont settled a $343 million class action lawsuit,. The most consequential study conducted so far of PFOS and PFOA effects on humans came out as a result of the class-action lawsuit against DuPont over the exposures in West. Wolverine Worldwide is facing more than 90 lawsuits stemming from its waste dumping practices and use of 3M’s non-detects for PFOA/PFAS or with levels well below the Michigan criteria and. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has advised the residents of Hoosick Falls, New York, not to drink the water from the public water supply, or use it for cooking, as it has been found to be contaminated with perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). The Office of the Attorney General anticipates its lawsuit against various manufacturers and distributors of aqueous film-forming foam will ultimately be shifted into multidistrict litigation in. See the 3M Settlement page for more information. The lawsuit, filed in state Supreme Court in Albany on Feb. The lawsuit, filed last year by environmental group Tennessee Riverkeeper, alleges synthetic chemicals manufactured by 3M at its plant in Decatur have been entering the Tennessee River for decades. New Jersey has been at the forefront of working to regulate PFAS, citing a lack of action from the federal government. has settled a lawsuit with Minnesota’s Attorney General Lori Swanson for $850 million. In 2001, 3M. Last year the epa hit the 3M corporation, maker of Scotchgard, with a $1. The residents may proceed with their claims of negligent failure to warn and negligent design defect, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania said. Du Pont De Nemours & Co (DuPont) has been accused by the U. The story began in 1951, when DuPont started purchasing PFOA (which the company refers to as C8) from 3M for use in the manufacturing of Teflon. 3M has said publicly that it intends to fight all the claims brought against it. The minuscule amounts of PFOA and PFOS we acquire from the water we drink and the food we eat accumulate in the body day-after-day, year-after-year. Ground contamination areas (where 3M dumped toxic sludge) is still being cleaned up. Ridgewood Water names 3M as the "primary manufacturer of PFOA and PFOS" for the past several decades in its complaint, pointing to products such as Scotchguard stain repellent, food packaging, coating substances and additives produced before 2002. 9 in federal district court, accused 3M Company, Dyneon DuPont de Nemouers and The Chemours Company of making, promoting and selling goods containing per- and. trace amounts of PFOA. Almost all the chemical companies face some kind of lawsuits. And as PFOA and PFOS firmly lodge themselves in blood proteins and critical organs, even small amounts of regular exposure may impact health far into the future. In 2001, 3M. There are several other settlements and lawsuits involving harmful chemicals produced by the company. Starting in 1951, DuPont purchased PFOA from 3M for use in the manufacturing of specific fluoropolymers—commercially branded as Teflon, but DuPont internally referred to the material as C8. A federal judge says a civil lawsuit filed by Vermont residents seeking damages from PFOA contamination in their Bennington neighborhood can proceed as a class-action lawsuit. A voluntary program for companies to reduce PFOA emissions and products by 2010, and eliminate them entirely by 2015, has been introduced by the EPA. In one lawsuit — filed against 3M Co. New Hampshire has sued eight companies including 3M and the DuPont Co. However, the most comprehensive study of PFOA health effects resulted from the 2006 settlement of a lawsuit brought against DuPont for contaminating the drinking water supply of approximately 70,000 people living in communities along the Ohio River in West Virginia and Ohio. may be poised to settle a lawsuit with Minnesota that sought $5 billion over pollution from former Scotchgard ingredients. New Hampshire is the latest state to file suit against a number of companies, including Dupont and 3M, for their roles in a nationwide drinking water contamination crisis. WESTFIELD - The city has filed a federal lawsuit against three manufacturers of firefighting foam contaminating water wells near Westfield-Barnes Regional Airport, Mayor Brian P. At all times relevant, 3M manufactured, marketed, promoted, distributed, and/or sold AFFF containing PFOA and/or PFOS used to fight fires at. , National Foam Inc. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today. Just a few days ago, the PFOS (perfluooctanesulfonic acid) and PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid) contamination litigation hit Massachusetts, as a group of Cape Cod residents filed a class action lawsuit against 3M, Chemguard, and Tyco Fire Products in which they claimed MA Highest Court Holds Pharma Companies Liable For Warnings. At least two other lawsuits have been filed against 3M over their manufacturing operations in Decatur, Alabama. contaminated with PFOA and PFOS, and who suffered bioaccumulation of PFOA and PFOS in their bodies. for damage it says has been caused by a class of potentially toxic chemicals found in pizza boxes. In February, 3M, the main producer of PFOA and PFOS, the most-studied of these chemicals, settled a groundwater pollution lawsuit with the state of Minnesota for $850 million. Governor Andrew M. At issue in the State's lawsuit is the manufacture, advertising, and sale in New Jersey of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) products that contain -- or break down into when released into the environment — chemicals known as PFOS (perfluorooctane sulfonic acid) and PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid). If letters the NYSDEC. New Hampshire does not seek a specific dollar amount in the lawsuits. PFOS and PFOA are fully fluorinated and the most common 3M was first to produce PFOS and higher homologues $235Mil class action lawsuit brought by citizens. in what could become one of the largest environmental lawsuits in the nation’s history. “3M acted responsibly in connection with its manufacture and sale of AFFF (aqueous film-forming foam) and will defend its record of environmental stewardship,” the statement says. The lawsuit claims that. The compound perfluorooctanesulfonamide (PFOSA), a PFOS precursor, was an ingredient and also has been described as the "key ingredient" of Scotchgard. Napoli Shkolnik PLLC has filed a lawsuit against five manufacturers of aqueous firefighting foams (“AFFF”) containing perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (“PFOS”) and perfluorooctanoic acid (“PFOA”) for the contamination of the groundwater relied upon by its 7,000 customers of. The state wants the companies to pay the cost of investigating, cleaning up and remediating the contamination. In 1947, manufacturing company 3M developed perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) — a member of the PFAS family. WWW used Scotchgard, a 3M product containing perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in its manufacturing process. DuPont and 3M submitted comments in response to the SAB draft report, stating that the weight of evidence in the published, peer-reviewed literature indicates that PFOA probably is not a cancer risk to. And the company continues to fight litigation related to the sale of products made using perfluorooctanyl compounds (PFOA and PFOS) and lawsuits for damages suffered by users of its respirator masks. In the state court case, Whitaker et al. Workers exposed to it were likely to have a level "thousands of times higher", he concedes, but there was no evidence it was doing them harm. , with claims the chemicals got into drinking water from sites like air force bases where they were used in firefighting. Case closure comes as global regulators consider PFOA restrictions. The lawsuit follows other legal actions by counties and residents in areas where perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) have been implicated in drinking water contamination, but is the first filed by a state to recover cleanup costs from releases of the fluorochemicals from airports into the environment. On February 20, 2018, the State of Minnesota and 3M Company ("3M") entered into an agreement settling the State's claims against 3M for contaminating the State's natural resources by releasing perfluorinated compounds ("PFASs"), including perfluorooctane sulfate ("PFOS") and perfluorooctanoic acid ("PFOA"), into the environment. Despite this, more than a dozen cases have ensued involving PFASs and specifically Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), and most recently GenX. Production of Scotchgard ended after 2000. National Foam, Inc. 3M to the possibility that PFOS might be mobile, persistent, bioaccumulative, and biomagnifying, as those characteristics could explain the absorption of PFOS in blood from 3M's products. Contact: Jeff Tittel, NJ Sierra Club, 609-558-9100. In February 2017, DuPont and its spinoff company agreed to pay nearly $671 million to thousands of Mid-Ohio Valley residents affected by C8, a man-made chemical used to make Teflon that has been linked to cancer and other serious side effects. Don’t drink the Teflon. 3M Letter from J. Another landfill, Bert Jeffries Landfill, was bought by 3M. The state alleged that the company had been dumping industrial chemicals in the. We regularly update the status of our litigation cases in our quarterly SEC filings. Our lawyers are filing lawsuits for current and former coal miners who have been diagnosed with coal workers’ pneumoconiosis (CWP), commonly known as black lung disease, after using allegedly defective dust masks and safety respirators manufactured by the 3M Company. DuPont, Honeywell International, and Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics have all faced major lawsuits in recent years as areas surrounding their facilities have reported contamination rates as high. 8, cites previously unpublicized PFOA/PFOS contamination at industrial, airport or firefighter training locations across upstate, including Momentive Performance Materials in Waterford, SI Group in Rotterdam Junction, AMRI Rensselaer and Empire Generating in Rensselaer, the Floyd. In the 1950s, 3M expanded worldwide with operations in Canada, Mexico, France, Germany, Australia, and the United Kingdom. 1 Legacy PFOS AFFF These foams were manufactured in the United States from the late 1960s until 2002 exclusively by 3M and sold. Winter 2005: MPCA, Minnesota Department of Health and 3M embark on a work plan to investigate PFOA and PFOS releases from the 3M Cottage Grove plant and 3M landfills into the Mississippi River and groundwater. In 1951, DuPont started purchasing PFOA from 3M for use in the manufacturing of teflon, a product that brought DuPont a billion dollars a year profit by the 1990s. YET ANOTHER PFOA (FIREFIGHTING FOAM CHEMICALS) CONTAMINATION LAWSUIT: Green et al v. In February, 3M, the main producer of PFOA and PFOS, the most-studied of these chemicals, settled a groundwater pollution lawsuit with the state of Minnesota for $850 million. October 7, 2015: A Water Company And Three Residents Filed A Class Action Lawsuit Claiming That 3M Contaminated The Tennessee River With Cancer-Causing Chemicals Called PFOA And PFOS. This settlement came on the heels of DuPont's and Chemours' $671M settlement in 2017 of more than 3,500 personal injury lawsuits arising from PFOA contamination of drinking water in Parkersburg, West Virginia. Named in the suit as defendants are 3M Company, the Ansul Company, Angus Fire, Buckeye Fire Protection Co. DuPont has already agreed to settle a massive C8 class action lawsuit involving more than 70,000 people who drank contaminated water in Ohio and West Virginia. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has advised the residents of Hoosick Falls, New York, not to drink the water from the public water supply, or use it for cooking, as it has been found to be contaminated with perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). has settled a lawsuit with Minnesota's Attorney General Lori Swanson for $850 million, putting an end to eight years of litigation over a former Scotchgard ingredient that got into the. New Hampshire has sued eight companies including 3M and the DuPont Co. Wolverine filed against 3M, its co-defendant in numerous cases involving PFAS contamination in Michigan, on Wednesday, Dec. Despite this, more than a dozen cases have ensued involving PFASs and specifically Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), and most recently GenX. 7 million settlement of a long-running PFOA lawsuit in the Mid-Ohio Valley. 5 6 PFOS was a key ingredient in 3M’s stain-resistant Scotchgard, which had thousands of consumer and industrial. Among other things, the lawsuits allege: 3M Combat Arms Earplugs are defective and unreasonably unsafe. Two lawsuits have been filed in Hillsborough County Superior Court North against 3M, DuPont, the Chemours Company, Chemguard, Tyco Fire Products, Buckeye Fire Equipment, Kidde-Fenwal and National. 3M settled similar allegations the next year for $1. And the day of reckoning may be coming sooner rather. And the company continues to fight litigation related to the sale of products made using perfluorooctanyl compounds (PFOA and PFOS) and lawsuits for damages suffered by users of its respirator masks. PFOA Drinking Water Contamination Lawsuit. Friday, October 18th 2019, 12:49 PM AKDT. In 1951, DuPont started purchasing PFOA from 3M for use in the manufacturing of teflon, a product that brought DuPont a billion dollars a year profit by the 1990s. A new movie called "Dark Waters," scheduled to be released in November 2019, is based on the true story of attorney Robert Bilott who discovered polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)—a group of chemicals that include perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)—in the drinking water of a suburban town. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) reached an agreement with 3M that provides $8 million to clean up PFCs in the Washington. The agreement. 5 ppb for PFOA,. Through their lawsuit, the residents are asking the Circuit Court of Lawrence County to force 3M Company, Inc. They list 35 other possible witnesses, including representatives of the Science. 13 Under pressure from EPA, 3M stopped making. The suit claims the defendants were responsible for bringing AFFF to the college, and that two toxic components of the foam, perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), caused their illnesses. The lawsuit claims that. is no stranger to lawsuits and settlements. The suits have been brought forth by West Morgan East Lawrence Water Authority and the Tennessee Riverkeeper. Foams manufactured before 2002 by 3M under the Light Water tradename contain PFOS. There were many conditions of the settlement. House considers dozens of bills to limit widely used PFAS. PFOA Drinking Water Contamination Lawsuit. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) reached an agreement with 3M that provides $8 million to clean up PFCs in the Washington. Water Contamination Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against 3M September 18 2016 - by Lucy Campbell Santa Clara, CA: An environmental class action lawsuit has been filed by residents living near two former military bases near Philadelphia, alleging 3m Co, a subsidiary of Tyco International, contaminated the local water supply. Township attorney Doug Van Essen called the 3M lawsuit a "stall tactic" and said that under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Wolverine, not 3M, is the responsible party for local. may be poised to settle a lawsuit with Minnesota that sought $5 billion over pollution from former Scotchgard ingredients after a trial was abruptly halted. Case closure comes as global regulators consider PFOA restrictions. as well as 3M. Defendant 3M Company ("3M") is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in St. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has advised the residents of Hoosick Falls, New York, not to drink the water from the public water supply, or use it for cooking, as it has been found to be contaminated with perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). At all times relevant, 3M manufactured, marketed, promoted, distributed, and/or sold AFFF containing PFOA and/or PFOS used to fight fires at. CONCORD (AP) — New Hampshire has sued eight companies, including 3M and the DuPont Co. and seven other companies have signed onto a voluntary U. In their quarterly filing to the U. One industrial application is as a surfactant in the emulsion polymerization of fluoropolymers. Well-known consumer products have helped bring these issues into public awareness. From 2002, 3M has manufactured AFFF that contained PFOS and PFOA. DuPont, Honeywell International, and Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics have all faced major lawsuits in recent years as areas surrounding their facilities have reported contamination rates as high. Minnesota-based 3M has filed a lawsuit against the state of New Hampshire, demanding a court "declare invalid" new rules limiting the legal limits in drinking water for several of the most toxic PFAS chemicals, including PFOA, PFOS, PFNA and PFHxS.